3 ms·
It’s objecting to the Cass report, which doesn’t include any new original data or experimental results. It’s fine to object to bad faith medical publications a
by vmchale 2y ago
It’s objecting to the Cass report, which doesn’t include any new original data or experimental results.
It’s fine to object to bad faith medical publications about an extreme minority, which is being granted authority by the NHS while more benevolent (and rigorous) researchers are being swept under the rug.
- blepitang 2y agoIt is incredible that people with zero medical expertise continue to attack a 4-year, expert, impartial review - based on 7 peer-reviewed systematic reviews - of the treatment of gender dysphoria in minors. Because they want distressed teens to be given drugs instead of therapy.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]