> I'm happy to up the ante by £50 to account for my second theory What's that, three pints in a pub inside the M25? :P Completely agree with this sentiment th

> I'm happy to up the ante by £50 to account for my second theory What's that, three pints in a pub inside the M25? :P Completely agree with this sentiment though, we've known that handling of binary data in memory unsafe languages has been risky for yonks. At the very least, fuzzing should've been employed here to try and detect these sorts of issues. More fundamentally though, where was their QA? These "channel files" just went out of the door without any idea as to their validity? Was there no continuous integration check to just .. ensure they parsed with the same parser as was deployed to the endpoints? And why were the channel files not deployed gradually?