3 ms·
malicious action on xitter. just like google forcing browsers to send full referrer cross domain by strong arming w3c with chrome. because their business model
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
malicious action on xitter.
just like google forcing browsers to send full referrer cross domain by strong arming w3c with chrome. because their business model depends on full referrer cross domain.
xitter decided it's business model depends on third party cookies. so they're strong arming users into enabling it on the browser globally.
everything is simple. there's no complex technological reason for any of those things. it's all access to your data and money.
the browser is the battle ground and they win every single time.
- matthewsinclair 2y ago> Xitter I fully endorse this use. I’ve been using it myself for some time. I’m so sick of newspapers writing “X (formerly Twitter)” everywhere. And “Xitter” has all of the right connotations for the cess pit that xitter has become.