> LLM's are just very advanced text prediction, and always will be How do you predict the next word in answering an abstract logic question without being capab

> LLM's are just very advanced text prediction, and always will be How do you predict the next word in answering an abstract logic question without being capable of abstract reasoning, though? In some sense it probably is possible, but this is a gaping flaw in your argument. A sufficiently advanced text prediction process has to encompass the process of abstract reasoning. The text prediction problem is necessarily a superset of the abstract reasoning problem. Ie, in the limit text prediction is fundamentally harder than abstract reasoning.