3 ms·
Huh, almost right. ("possible, but not guaranteed?" it's necessarily true. That whole sentence was a waste of space, and wrong.) Edit: I mean "if there is any
by card_zero 2y ago
Huh, almost right. ("possible, but not guaranteed?" it's necessarily true. That whole sentence was a waste of space, and wrong.)
Edit: I mean "if there is any overlap", it's necessarily true. I should have quoted the whole thing.
- jdietrich 2y agoNope, ChatGPT was right, the answer is indeterminable. The klorps that are gronks could be a wholly distinct subset to the klorps that are floots. It also correctly evaluates "All gronks are floots. Some gronks are klorps. Are any floots klorps?", to which the answer is definitively yes.
- card_zero 2y ago> The klorps that are gronks could be a wholly distinct subset to the klorps that are floots. So? It's still the case that "if there is any overlap between floots and klorps," it is "guaranteed, that some floots are klorps." It's tautological. Unless there's a way to read "overlap" so that it doesn't mean "some of one category are also in the other category, and vice versa"? Oh, when I said "it's necessarily true" I was refering to this last sentence of the output, not the question posed in the input. Hence we are at cross purposes I think.