3 ms·
I honestly don’t know what point you’re trying to make here. The Harris Ranch statement couldn’t be any clearer about the contents of the building in question a
by thebruce87m 2y ago
I honestly don’t know what point you’re trying to make here. The Harris Ranch statement couldn’t be any clearer about the contents of the building in question and you’re still going on about who is leasing what.
I think you’re wrong ( and know it ) and you’re digging even deeper with stuff like “When you rent an apartment, it is your property” to “win” and that is severely uninteresting to me.
- fsckboy 2y agoyes, you honestly don't know. Their statement uses the word property, and the word building. You don't. You need to use both words properly to see the distinction they and I are drawing.
- thebruce87m 2y agoAgain, here is the important part of the statement: > The building indicated is not, nor has it ever been a diesel plant. This statement does not contain the word property. This statement tells you all you need to know. You do not need to know who owns this building, who owns the Tesla charging infrastructure or who owns the land that the charging station is on or anything else. People spreading misinformation were saying this building was a diesel plant. That statement tells you it isn’t. You now have all the information needed.