3 ms·
I think it boils down to the Truth In Lending Act [1] requires credit card companies to provide more protections than the Electronic Fund Transfer Act [2] requi
by jlarocco 14y ago
I think it boils down to the Truth In Lending Act [1] requires credit card companies to provide more protections than the Electronic Fund Transfer Act [2] requires banks to provide. And according to Wikipedia, the TLA is ~10 years older than the EFTA, so at one time only credit card transfers were protected at all.
And regardless of the law, it kind of makes sense. A debit card transfers money directly from your account to the vendor's account. With a credit card they have to get the money from Visa, and Visa has to get the money from you. If you say, "This isn't what I wanted, I'm not paying," it doesn't matter with a debit card because the money is already gone. Visa isn't going to get screwed, so if you threaten not to pay, they're not going to give money to the vendor until it's settled.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_in_Lending_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_in_Lending_Act
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Fund_Transfer_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Fund_Transfer_Act
- mturmon 14y agoWhat a nice explanation. Here's an FTC page that amplifies this: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/credit/cre04.shtm http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/credit/cre04.shtm This page relates to your maximum loss if you lose your card, but it also details that the two instruments are governed by different laws. If you lose your credit card, your max liability is $50. But if you lose your debit card, there's a sliding scale of liability (going all the way up to, "your entire balance") depending on how soon you notify your bank.