> The update proved incompatible with the latest stable version of Debian, despite the specific Linux configuration being supposedly supported. > The analysis

> The update proved incompatible with the latest stable version of Debian, despite the specific Linux configuration being supposedly supported. > The analysis revealed that the Debian Linux configuration was not included in their test matrix. This is suspiciously close to actual fraud. They declare they support configuration X, but they actually do not do any testing on configuration X. That's like telling me my car will have seatbelts, but in no place in manufacturing it is ensured the seatbelts are actually installed and work. I think a car maker that does something like that would be prosecuted. Why Crowdstrike isn't? I mean, one thing if they don't support some version of Linux - ok, too many of them, I can get it. But if you advertise support for it without even bothering to test on it - that's at best willful negligence and possibly outright fraud.