3 ms·
In a twisted way, Crowdstrike just gave western civilization a disaster recovery and resilience forced test. an actual attack won't be rolled back within an hou
by notepad0x90 2y ago
In a twisted way, Crowdstrike just gave western civilization a disaster recovery and resilience forced test. an actual attack won't be rolled back within an hour.
In case you don't know, Crowdstrike is hardly the only company with large scale access to this many companies,governments and resources. It takes one rogue employee to deploy a disk wiper that destroys every computer (including linux and macos) and affected systems won't recover at all. it would be months before critical systems are back online, the global economy would come to a halt worse than how it did with COVID in such a scenario.
It isn't "why didn't Crowdstrike do better" (although they should have), it is more, why isn't technology in critical systems more resilient to one vendor screwing up or getting hacked?
For example, let's say it wasn't just a boot loop but a disk wiper erased every boot disk, is there any reason pxe booting a recovery image or a backup image configured already on servers, atms, kiosks, point of sale systems,etc...? even if UEFI and bios were erased, it is technically not impossible to have an auto-recovery mechanism implemented right?
If you have never been in an incident response (IT and security incidents) root cause analysis, I don't blame you for not thinking deeper about the root cause, but that is the type of root cause analysis that has been missing despite over a decade of rampant ransomware, disk wipers, and supply chain risks.
Finding someone to blame and be angry at is easy and doesn't solve the root cause. Making hard technical decisions and not wasting this opportunity (never waste a good crisis) to push for resilient technology investments actually solves the root cause behind this and other repeating problems.
- yusyusyus 2y agoif the firmware is totally nuked, you'd need backup firmware. at some point, all of this crap can be made non-recoverable, but that isn't the real problem to solve. imma take your comment one step further and say that the emphasis on security is coming at the expense of discussions on resilience. and security matters a lot less, especially financially, than resilience.
- notepad0x90 2y agoavailability is one of the core tenets of security. Security = a measurement of confidentiality, integrity and availability. Backup firmware and boot images can be configured as read only.