2 ms·
> Value it provides is for the business. If a tool can do it, there is no need to hire or keep an engineering team. What exactly is the "value?". It worked bef
by nerdjon 2y ago
> Value it provides is for the business. If a tool can do it, there is no need to hire or keep an engineering team.
What exactly is the "value?". It worked before so what is the purpose of the change.
> First. It's a tool that does, so reliable more than a human.
Sorry but, are you new to LLM's? Have you seen the recent news? "Reliable" it is not.
If your pitch is that an LLM will just write all of your code in the first place, there really isn't any need to migrate the code to another language when by your logic the LLM could just manage its existing language. The logic here quickly breaks down and doesn't make any sense.
- _f9cu 2y agoWhat news? I'm not talking about LLM. I'm talking about the challenge of cross language and code generation
- nerdjon 2y ago> What news? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40475578 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40475578 One such news entry, LLM's being unreliable is not a controversial opinion. It is well known and easy to find many instances of similar issues. > code generation What exactly do you think is generating the code? The article here is about generating code with an LLM.