4 ms·
I don't see how IPv6 on mobile data helps anyone but law enforcement and your mobile provider. Keeping smartphones behind a NAT (that can still speak IPv6 to th
by revelation 14y ago
I don't see how IPv6 on mobile data helps anyone but law enforcement and your mobile provider. Keeping smartphones behind a NAT (that can still speak IPv6 to the outside world if it were inclined to do so) and avoiding the baseband turmoil seems like a winning strategy.
- gonzo 14y agoyou do understand that ipv6 has mandatory ipsec, right?
- ge0rg 14y agoIt is mandatory for devices to support IPSec, not to enable it for all connections. Beside of that, where should the IPSec tunnel be terminated to get around interception?
- jauer 14y agoYou realize that v6 with a public IP vs v4 behind NAT on mobile data makes no difference for law enforcement, right? Carrier NAT keeps a record of who was using what ports when so they can trace it out.
- revelation 14y agoAnd who exactly keeps remote ports in his apache log?
- sohn 14y agoNo one, but you probably keep timestamps with seconds.