3 ms·
I would also go same way and remove states. Just move everything under centralized federal government. Or maybe keep them for some regional offices, but all dec
by Ekaros 2y ago
I would also go same way and remove states. Just move everything under centralized federal government. Or maybe keep them for some regional offices, but all deciding power should rest on congress and senate. And even there, getting rid of voting districts and just electing top x number of candidates seems most reasonable solution.
- DemocracyFTW2 2y agoI do not agree. As an analogue, consider "files". Files are good. But do not put each letter in a file of its own. I've seen projects that experimentally used one method definition per file which was also not very workable. But don't put all of your data into a single file, either. People will want to have local representation, which means local elections and boundaries for the reach of local government. When it comes to state-wide and national elections, either re-use these existing boundaries or determine districts using a fair algorithm. The way that politicians get to gerrymander their own seats is an ongoing scandal. With approval voting replacing first-past-the-post, districts in presidential elections would be reduced to a mere organizational function. No redrawing of arbitrary borders should influence the outcome. It will still be important to ensure open and fair procedures; nobody should be forced to drive a car to reach a single distant mail ballot box or voting station only to have then to queue up for hours. This and other measures have been used in the past to defraud voters.