3 ms·
> Yet similar logic could be used to say that papyrus scrolls burned to a crisp would be unreadable. We also know what papyrus scrolls look like, know what the
by darby_nine 2y ago
> Yet similar logic could be used to say that papyrus scrolls burned to a crisp would be unreadable.
We also know what papyrus scrolls look like, know what they were used for, and have a lot of examples of writing from that time period and place we can use to actively search for more, similar data. If you think about the mechanical process that must take place and the materials that they had at hand to record audio the chances of this happening accidentally in a way we could know how to read or look there without having witnessed the production of the audio to begin with are just staggeringly low.
But, of course, I would love for this to be possible too, and I also imagine there's some really interesting stuff out there if one knows just where to look and how to read it. I had considered glass before as it's perturbed by the air as it's blown and holds its form well very quickly as it cools. But I wouldn't know the first thing of how to read that, and blown glass is much more delicate and rarely survives.
- adastra22 2y ago> without having witnessed the production of the audio We know how they made pottery. We could recreate the process ourselves and look for that signal first (which we know is there because we put it there), before doing any invasive sampling of ancient artifacts.