This article is weird clickbait which, even weirder, worked. It seems to assume a world where SEO entrepreneurs where ready to churn out million-page sites, bu

This article is weird clickbait which, even weirder, worked. It seems to assume a world where SEO entrepreneurs where ready to churn out million-page sites, but the cost per query were blocking them. There is no marginal cost, no SEO cost to adding another page, as long as a couple people visit it and "pay it off". In the real world, it doesn't work like that. Whatever monstrosity was created like this would not do well in the search engines. So no meaningful threshold has been passed, in terms of the cost for AI generation. People are creating lots of AI content, but not like this - not bottom tier generic SEO pages which will barely rank and aren't that compelling in an already saturated Internet. Incidentally the real money seems to be in generating AI images and, eventually, video: much better return for your money.