Is there not responsibility at some level as well to Microsoft for having a kernel which even loaded this? Not just because of the apparent corruption, but also

Is there not responsibility at some level as well to Microsoft for having a kernel which even loaded this? Not just because of the apparent corruption, but also ... it was, I heard.. signed and given a bit of an MS blessing. This crap shouldn't be run in kernel space. But putting that aside, we need kernels that will be resilient to and reject this stuff.