3 ms·
It's a nice idea, but has that worked historically? Some people will make changes, but I think we'd be naive to think that things will change in any large and m
by johnklos 2y ago
It's a nice idea, but has that worked historically? Some people will make changes, but I think we'd be naive to think that things will change in any large and meaningful way.
Having another I-told-you-so isn't so bad, though - it does give us IT people a little more latitude when we tell people that buying the insecurity fix du jour increases work and adds more problems than it addresses.
- __MatrixMan__ 2y agoSure, on long enough timescales. I mean, there's less lead in the environment than there used to be. We don't practice blood letting anymore. Things change. Eventually enough will be enough and we'll start using systems that are transparent about what their inputs are and have a way of operating in cases where the user disables one of those inputs because it's causing problems (e.g. crowdstrike updates). I'd just like it to be soon because I'm interested in building such systems and I'd rather be paid to do so instead of doing it on my off time.
- Bluestein 2y ago> We don't practice blood letting anymore. Things change Gonna make me a Tshirt outta this :)