4 ms·
Today, we comply by ticking all the boxes in a checklist; it takes care of the most obvious hacks. Is it good enough? Today, we got our answer. Practically s
by rawgabbit 2y ago
Today, we comply by ticking all the boxes in a checklist; it takes care of the most obvious hacks. Is it good enough? Today, we got our answer.
Practically speaking, that is all the end-user can do with Windows machines. My point is Windows is fundamentally unsecure. It is a dike with thousands of holes some of which are not even visible to Microsoft themselves. The reason of that is security has been after-thought. It is band aids/plasters put on top of other plasters.
- UweSchmidt 2y agoBecause security experts seem to have this slight dismissive attitude about companies' and individuals' attempts to do security, while not usually having answers or providing secure systems.
- bostik 2y agoSadly most so-called security experts are not hands-on professionals but hands-off "cybersecurity persons". They do not do any real work themselves, they only generate useless busywork for others. There are people in that category who are not hands-on themselves but still have sufficiently deep understanding of technical details. But as one might guess, they are about as common as four-leaf clovers.
- type0 2y agowindows security experts are as useful as astrologists, but astrologists are cheaper