3 ms·
None of those things require a kernel module with remote code execution to configure properly.
by the8472 2y ago
None of those things require a kernel module with remote code execution to configure properly.
- jabroni_salad 2y agoI believe the question was 'in which ways is windows vulnerable by default', and I answered that. If customers wanted to configure them properly, they could, but they don't. EDR will let them keep all the garbage they seem to love so dearly. It doesn't just check a box, it takes care of many other boxes too.
- the8472 2y agoAt work we have two sets of computers. One gets beamed down by our multi-national overlords, loaded with all kinds of compliance software. The other is managed by local IT and only uses windows defender, has some strict group policies applied, BMCs on a separate vlans etc. Both pass audits, for whatever that's worth.
- apitman 2y agoThis is the key question for me: is there a way to get [most of] the security benefits of EDR without giving away the keys to the kingdom.
- lucasRW 2y agoNo. If an EDR relies on userland mechanisms to monitor, these userland mechanisms can easily be removed by the malicious process too.