3 ms·
yeah, “chevron deference” was only really an issue with ambiguously written laws IMO, or agencies taking an overly expansive view of their authority. And they s
by ghufran_syed 2y ago
yeah, “chevron deference” was only really an issue with ambiguously written laws IMO, or agencies taking an overly expansive view of their authority. And they still can, but now those decisions can be challenged in court.
good summary here: https://www.rstreet.org/commentary/chevron-is-out-of-gas-will-it-fuel-changes-to-the-fcc/ https://www.rstreet.org/commentary/chevron-is-out-of-gas-wil...
- ceejayoz 2y agoWhich means a denial of service attack on the system is most certainly coming via that jurisdiction in Texas that has the single judge who loves issuing national injunctions.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoI think people misunderstand the deference standard that was actually overturned and explaining looper helps