3 ms·
I agree. It seems like you're back to the typesystems of c or java 1.6. The very typesystems that drove people to ruby and friends in the previous decade.
by adamwk 2y ago
I agree. It seems like you're back to the typesystems of c or java 1.6. The very typesystems that drove people to ruby and friends in the previous decade.
- lmm 2y agoWTF? No. Those have the almost opposite problem: they're famously inflexible, meaning you end up with lots of repetition, or else people resort to reflection or casting.