4 ms·
> This is one of those things some people are okay with, up until the point where they get bitten by it. > I think even you'd be upset if you started losing ou
by randallsquared 2y ago
> This is one of those things some people are okay with, up until the point where they get bitten by it.
> I think even you'd be upset if you started losing out on job opportunities because one of these services confused you with a convict of a similar name or address.
Wait a sec, though. I think significantly fewer people (read: almost no people) are "okay with" misinformation being reported about them, than are okay with actual information about their history being reported. There are three separate cases here: (1) accurate information regarding whether a applicant is a potentially good customer based on their history, (2) accidentally inaccurate information about that, and (3) fraudulently inaccurate information about that. The "some people" who are okay with "this" are okay with the first. If you have to lump the second and third in to drum up outrage, maybe that's a sign that the outrage is not all that appropriate.
- mywittyname 2y agoYou're making my point. In your own words, "almost no people" would be okay with misinformation be sold about them. Yet misinformation is being sold them. And all these vendors hide behind the "we don't guarantee the accuracy of this data" disclaimer. Requiring data sold to be accurate is a type of privacy regulation. And it's one that would basically kill all of these industries because nobody can make that guarantee.