> When it is changed from IRV complexity is never the reason it's a reason why voters vote YES to repeal it. > The argument proffered in favour of returning t

> When it is changed from IRV complexity is never the reason it's a reason why voters vote YES to repeal it. > The argument proffered in favour of returning to FFP is always "simplicity". It is a lie. you're talking about politicians. the more crucial side of the equation is _voters_, who have to vote on whether to repeal it.