> ...manually curate a high-quality (consistent) text corpus based on undisputed, well curated wikipedia articles and battle tested scientific literature. This

> ...manually curate a high-quality (consistent) text corpus based on undisputed, well curated wikipedia articles and battle tested scientific literature. This assumption is based on the mistaken assumption that science is about objective truth. It is confusing the map for the territory. Scientific models are intended to be useful, not perfect. Statistical learning, vs symbolic learning is about existential quantification vs universal quantification respectively. All models are wrong some are useful, this applies to even the most unreasonably accurate versions like QFT and GR. Spherical cows, no matter how useful are hotly debated outside of the didactic half truths of low level courses. The corpus that the above seeks doesn't exist in academic circles, only in popular science where people don't see that practical, useful models are far more important that 'correct' ones.