3 ms·
I have been thinking about local privacy preserving AI lately and stenography circumscribes much of the challenge. Having access to sensitive data means you hav
by ganzuul 2y ago
I have been thinking about local privacy preserving AI lately and stenography circumscribes much of the challenge. Having access to sensitive data means you have to limit access to a lot of tools. That’s how it would work in a privacy context but the same tools are neutral to being used in a censorship context.
It’s over 10 years since but it would be nice if important research like this at least touched on the egalitarian issues rather than presenting a partisan agenda. E.g. someone somewhere who has to deal with private data now also has to deal with even stricter restrictions, without any doubt.
Sometimes I worry about researchers working on important issues with apparently blinders on. If we don’t self-supervise we just outsource the work, and in this case that means we are back to square one.
- NavinF 2y agoResearch like this does not touch on that issue because it’s completely unrelated. Why would someone trying to exfiltrate private data have to do key exchange? Moreover, if you try to enforce anything by placing a bump in the wire (the only thing defeated by this), you’re gonna lose every time. This “what if a bad guy has access to technology too!?” argument is tiresome.