4 ms·
I now see gpt-4o-mini listed at https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4o-mini https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4o-mini Looking at https://open
by OutOfHere 2y ago
I now see gpt-4o-mini listed at https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4o-mini https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4o-mini
Looking at https://openai.com/index/gpt-4o-mini-advancing-cost-efficient-intelligence/ https://openai.com/index/gpt-4o-mini-advancing-cost-efficien... , gpt-4o-mini is better than gpt-3.5 but worse than gpt-4o, as was expected. gpt-4o-mini is cheaper than both, however. Independent third-party performance benchmarks will help.
- guilamu 2y agoClaude 3.5 sonnet is so much better in every test I made (coding and everyday mondain stuffs), it beats me why anyone would choose chatgpt (I'm using free versions only).
- OutOfHere 2y ago> Claude 3.5 sonnet is so much better Good to know, although this is targeting cheaper API use for specific applications in which a second-tier model is sufficient. Note however that according to the LMSYS Leaderboard, GPT-4o rates slightly higher than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. > mondain stuffs Mundane, not mondain.
- guilamu 2y agoFor some reason I can't edit and fix the typo. Anyhow, thanks for the correction. No idea what the leaderboard says, it's just been night and day for me since Sonnet 3.5 got out. Maybe my use case is just what sonnet does best.