4 ms·
The fundamental assumption here is that you are in such a fantastically stable environment that you can spend days planning the next 8-12 weeks, and then that p
by tacitusarc 2y ago
The fundamental assumption here is that you are in such a fantastically stable environment that you can spend days planning the next 8-12 weeks, and then that plan is actually reliable.
My experience was that maybe 20-40 percent of the plan ended up working (blocked by external factors, shifting market landscape, missed or unexpected work coming up), and then there was a huge amount replanning and time wasted.
I just cannot reconcile that 8-12 week cycles is in any way conducive to agile development.
- brightball 2y agoPersonally, I’m a huge fan of the 37 Signals approach. They do 6 weeks planned, 2 weeks unplanned as their regular cadence.