4 ms·
The reasoning in this article feels very human-centric. Most animals are likely conscious and self-aware to some extent. Yet, lots of species are loners, not wh
by poikroequ 2y ago
The reasoning in this article feels very human-centric. Most animals are likely conscious and self-aware to some extent. Yet, lots of species are loners, not what we would consider social. How would you explain their self-awareness?
I also don't agree with trying to find a single reason for self-awareness. Lots of evolutionary adaptations are beneficial in more than one way. Our bloodstream delivers nutrients to cells. Our bloodstream is also distributes immune cells throughout our body. Our bloodstream also clots when we have a cut and carries cells to help repair damaged tissue. Why can't self-awareness be beneficial in multiple ways as well? Why can't it have multiple reasons for evolving?