3 ms·
I guess you are aware Sublime Text 2 has a Vim mode. As someone who's gone "far in Vim's world", how do you think this compares to regular Vim? I'm starting to
by dave1010uk 14y ago
I guess you are aware Sublime Text 2 has a Vim mode. As someone who's gone "far in Vim's world", how do you think this compares to regular Vim? I'm starting to learn Vim commands in ST2 but I don't know if "proper" Vim is required to get fully into Vim.
- udp 14y agoOne thing I miss in ST2 Vintage mode is that <> brackets aren't recognized with things like ci< and di<.
- edanm 14y agoI'll be brutally honest. I think it's a great effort, and almost moved back to Sublime Text w Vintage mode several times. And each time, I'll run a command that Vintage mode doesn't have yet, and leave. I'd love it if ST managed to replace vim. I (very unfortunately!) don't see it happening soon. Vim just has so many features and so many plugins. NOTE: Half of my plugins in Vim are only there to make vim behave like a decent, modern editor. In fact, half of my plugins in Vim are there to make it behave more like Sublime Text.
- growt 14y agoI think it's one of the best vim-emulations I've seen so far. It's not 100% but it has things like text-objects (cit, etc.), named buffers and bookmarks (which most of the other emulations miss).