3 ms·
I think, that's a valid point. The reason we show social share to give you a sense how important the content is based on other user's perspective. But that is o
by bcambel 14y ago
I think, that's a valid point. The reason we show social share to give you a sense how important the content is based on other user's perspective. But that is only a data. If a website does not put Facebook Like button, that does not mean the content is not important.
We're not for content publishers in that sense. We have the data to show, but I don't think that's our core business. ( A case to pivot right? )
- vladd 14y agoFacebook only shows the number of likes next to its content. Google doesn't have any kind of "like" number displayed in its search results (except the ordering of the results in itself). Either way, I wouldn't call any of it "statistics". If you have ranking metrics (social share, etc) which you can put together in a single number, you can display it, Facebook-like, next to the content, but use "ranking" rather than "statistics" in the pitch.
- bcambel 14y agoWe have discussed this quite a long time (5+ months) What we realized that, showing a single number is lean, but what's that number? Based on what ? Rank vs Stats, guess Rank sounds better. Thanks vladd