3 ms·
Codebase fraud is rampant too. The company has very excellent coding and test interviews but the codebase is just shit.
by lawgimenez 2y ago
Codebase fraud is rampant too.
The company has very excellent coding and test interviews but the codebase is just shit.
- selcuka 2y ago> The company has very excellent coding and test interviews but the codebase is just shit. It is also possible that this is because of all the fraud developers they've hired. A "company" is not a person. It doesn't produce shit code itself. While management can also be a source of bad codebase, it is usually the developers.
- lawgimenez 2y agoOh? Do you not blame the front office of a sports time for failing to win a championship or assembling a shitty team?
- selcuka 2y agoNo, because resume fraud is very rare in sports. What is expected from an athlete is very clear. If they can't run x metres in y seconds then they are out. This is not so clear cut in software development, so yes, I don't blame management when they accidentally hire an incompetent, fraud developer. Obviously it is a different story when management hires good developers but can't maintain a good workplace culture, apply unnecessary time pressure, don't pay them enough etc.
- gedy 2y ago> While management can also be a source of bad codebase, it is usually the developers. Plot twist: the devs who are good at leet code quizzes are frequently crap product developers on teams.