6 ms·
> first discovered it There's more than one issue here, and you're conflating them. IF the logging issue was non-public and non-resolved at the time I wanted t
by Retr0id 2y ago
> first discovered it
There's more than one issue here, and you're conflating them. IF the logging issue was non-public and non-resolved at the time I wanted to publish my article, I'd probably have given them longer.
> Why would they request an extension
If they thought 1.5 working days wasn't enough to provide GPL sources, for whatever reason. I don't see how you can argue that 1.5 days is simultaneously too short, and not in need of an extension.
- fantasybuilder 2y agoYour outrage sounds disingenuous. 1.5 days is definitely not a reasonable timeframe for a response to a partially resolved issue. What is 1.5 days in this context? Friday afternoon and Monday? Do you and their security engineers even live in the same time zone?
- qual 2y ago>Your outrage sounds disingenuous. I've read through these comment chains a few times, but I'm having a really hard time finding the "outrage", disingenuous or otherwise. Can you quote the part of the comment that displayed outrage? >Do you and their security engineers even live in the same time zone? Reading through this thread, you can find where the OP says that the time zones were accounted for.
- Retr0id 2y agoThis is a symptom of a broader narrative perpetuated the company itself, that any criticism is from "haters".
- fantasybuilder 2y agoI know nothing about the product they are selling. As an engineer, I think writing a critical blog post after giving just a 1.5 day notice is bad behavior.