4 ms·
One of the pillars of fair use is whether it disrupts the market for the original work. The explicit goal of gen ai is to replace artists and their original wor
by manchmalscott 2y ago
One of the pillars of fair use is whether it disrupts the market for the original work. The explicit goal of gen ai is to replace artists and their original work.
- bb88 2y agoIf I train a gen AI on the full works of Pablo Picasso, and ask it to create new works, have I disrupted the market for the original works of Pablo Picasso? If I train people to draw anime from a book on how to draw anime, and ask them to start drawing work related to Bleach (e.g.), have I disrupted the market for the original works of Bleach?
- c1sc0 2y agoI thought the explicit goal of AI was to create systems that can do tasks that typically require human intelligence. That includes beneficial things like finding cures for diseases, technology innovation, etc … Wouldn’t it be a shame to limit this growth potential to protect friggin’ YouTubers? Maybe go after the application, not the technology? Someone uses AI to explicitly plagiarize an artist’s content? Sure, go ahead & sue! But limiting the growth potential of a whole class of technology seems like a bad idea, a really bad idea actually if your military enemy had made that same technology a top priority for the next years …