4 ms·
Well? Aren't you going to spill some juicy details about the supposed "large action model"?
by rideontime 2y ago
Well? Aren't you going to spill some juicy details about the supposed "large action model"?
- Retr0id 2y agoI believe the juicy details are "It's a marketing term for getting off-the-shelf LLMs to call out to pre-written browser automation scripts", but I'd love to hear it from the horse's mouth.
- TestingWithEdd 2y agoThis is what coffeezilla said on his channel after speaking to devs at Rabbit
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- klabb3 2y agoWhen I saw the browser/app automation “RAG” thingy in the first presentation I was instantly suspicious. I’m sure the AI is hard enough (that I don’t know) but I do know that everyone is fighting against automation and scraping, so it’s an arms race that’s very difficult to win. Simulating human behavior isn’t enough (sometimes being human isn’t even enough either). For instance, I know that a fintech company (big name) had deployed a physical android phone fleet to sign in to banks on behalf of users, around 8 years ago. That’s because the bank had used extensive fingerprinting tech to lock out any automation. It’s sad, but the world is much less interoperable than it used to be. That’s not Rabbits fault, but obviously lying about it is.