4 ms·
> Graded readers are ideal early on Depends on learner. I’ve seen people really love graded readers from an early stage. I personally can’t stand them until th
by csa 2y ago
> Graded readers are ideal early on
Depends on learner. I’ve seen people really love graded readers from an early stage. I personally can’t stand them until the 1000-2000 word or more range. Note that I am a big fan of extensive reading, but the lower level stuff just makes my eyes bleed, and in some cases is just bad (e.g., graded English readers that use lower frequency meanings of common words to meet a word limit).
> going through multiple textbooks aimed at your level (e.g. an intro textbook from publisher A and another intro textbook from publisher B) is a good strategy
Very underrated, imho. I wish more folks would do this.
> Materials aimed at 5 or 6 year-old native learners are also often a decent path
Again, this makes my eyes bleed. There is often quite a bit of words that are aimed at children that maybe aren’t the best for beginning learners. I can’t remember what they were with Japanese, but I’m pretty sure a lot of them were onomatopoeic words that every Japanese kid knows but non-native speakers do not… and probably should not learn that early in the process.
Iirc, third grade is when the language becomes more “standard” and less kids talk, middle school stuff is godly for beginning mid-range fluency, and high school content fleshes out mid-range fluency (as one might expect).
Books and online content aimed at teenaged readers can be surprisingly accessible, with the main challenge being to find material with substance (imho).