3 ms·
Thanks for the summary. The article looks interesting, but I didn't have the time to properly read it.
by CoastalCoder 2y ago
Thanks for the summary. The article looks interesting, but I didn't have the time to properly read it.
- codetrotter 2y ago[flagged]
- candiddevmike 2y agoI prefer HN without LLM slop
- hooverd 2y ago"Summarized by ChatGPT" is the new "have you tried sfc /scannow?"
- codetrotter 2y agoThe original reason I had an LLM summarize it was to see if the parent had themselves used an LLM to make their summary. And then it turned out to include some extra info from the linked article that for me was sufficient to decide that I should read the whole linked article. So that’s why I posted it in this sub thread. (For the record I also think there is a difference between quoting LLM output in a comment, vs people who post LLM written slop and passing it off as something they themselves wrote.)
- benatkin 2y agoIt seems to do really well at that. It reminded me of the article “is ChatGPT a bit unsporting?”: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37069387 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37069387