For the people debating on the line between art and pornography: That's really not the point of the article at all. The point they're making is that large tech

For the people debating on the line between art and pornography: That's really not the point of the article at all. The point they're making is that large tech companies (an in particular Meta) want all the benefits of having lots of users, without the investment needed to account for them. They therefore use technology in place of humans to detect policy violations. Since art is a human thing (see debates here), machines are not suitable for this purpose. Meta uses them anyway because their business model falls apart if they don't.