The prudishness of censorship has always been a blight upon people's ability to express freely in interesting ways. I disagree. Expression is separate from dis

The prudishness of censorship has always been a blight upon people's ability to express freely in interesting ways. I disagree. Expression is separate from distribution. People are almost always free to express themselves. Sometimes, they can only do it in private or anonymously. This is why safe spaces are important. Additionally, interesting artistic expression can be a reaction to censorship. Maybe a simple analogy is rock n roll music or rap music. At a time, it was was being censored way worse than this. After reaching critical mass despite not having mainstream infrastructure, it thrives today. Just because something isn't mainstream, it doesn't mean it's not being expressed, cultivated, consumed or explored. Just like there were clubs that supported alternative music, there are corners of the "digital world" that support art of all kinds. On that note, a lot of people were smart and embraced the Streisand Effect. Come see the art Mark Zuckerberg doesn't want you to see :)