3 ms·
> SEPA is free and easy to use. Really? Then why do merchants use card terminals at all then? You want to give a homeless person money on the street, how does
by olalonde 2y ago
> SEPA is free and easy to use.
Really? Then why do merchants use card terminals at all then?
You want to give a homeless person money on the street, how does the SEPA payment flow look like?
> still need a bank account, still need to apply for a physical card
Free but time consuming. Typically needs to be done in person and requires waiting in line.
> still need to pay high transaction fees
Fees are closer to 1% or more for credit cards.
> no way to list who is authorized to charge your card
It's a problem if you forget who has your credit card info and it's often a hassle to "unsubscribe" yourself. Sometimes, the only way is to call your card's customer service.
> Nope, there a bunch of startups such as SumUp with very affordable terminals.
"A standard fee of 1.69% per transaction applies for all our card readers."
I feel like you just haven't used WeChat/Alipay enough to realize how better it is from a UX point of view. It's really obvious to anyone who has used both systems extensively.
- sofixa 2y ago> Really? Then why do merchants use card terminals at all then? Because it's easier, faster, and has more protections/provisions for payments. > Free but time consuming. Typically needs to be done in person and requires waiting in line. There have been fully online banks for around a decade now in most EU countries. > I feel like you just haven't used WeChat/Alipay enough to realize how better it is from a UX point of view I haven't no, but none of your arguments are anything about the UX itself. It still sucks, comparatively, to have to open an app, click a button, scan a QR code, and then type information vs just tapping a card/watch/phone with the payment information pre-filled. The fact that fees might be lower, there might be better b2c and c2c support, etc etc are irrelevant to how bad the UX at the point of use is.