I didn't speculate on whether or not he earns or deserves it. It's just antithetical to the concept of equity as used in DEI, which is roughly equal outcome des

I didn't speculate on whether or not he earns or deserves it. It's just antithetical to the concept of equity as used in DEI, which is roughly equal outcome despite unequal circumstance. You might tell me here why in fact it does not actually apply here because reasons, if so fine I'm not an expert on DEI matters. But that would not be so relevant to my point, which is common understanding and concepts people have around that word potentially having difficulty coexisting with highly stratified company like MS.