3 ms·
I see, so bindings for gql constructs is what we’re after?
by lijok 2y ago
I see, so bindings for gql constructs is what we’re after?
- valenterry 2y agoYeah. But since gql is very flexible, you then also want to combine them in an adhoc way but still get the right structure/types back. Then there is also batching, reusing inputs and so on, so ultimately a library saves a lot of time and effort when things grow bigger.