3 ms·
That's missing the broader point. It's a web browser and users don't want this 'feature'. None of this is necessary for me to browse the web which is all I want
by weare138 2y ago
That's missing the broader point. It's a web browser and users don't want this 'feature'. None of this is necessary for me to browse the web which is all I want from my web browser.
Why should I have to jump through hoops and compromise my security and privacy to help some corporation with their marketing and advertising metrics? Why not just make this an opt-in option for users who want to volunteer their data to help these ad-tech companies? Oh that's right, no one in their right mind would do that.
And the CTO's whole argument about stopping the 'perpetual arms race' by compromising with and appeasing the aggressor is absurd. Malicious actors and ad-tech companies will just exploit this too. If there's a legitimate way to access this data then we can only assume there's an illegitimate way to do it also.
- ineptech 2y agoNo offense but are you confident you know what PPA is/does? "volunteer their data" doesn't seem a remotely fair characterization to me. Ignore the CTO's hand-wavey justification and go look at what it actually does and tell me if you still hate it this much. I agree with you ideologically but I think you're engaging in friendly fire here.