I think you're imagining something like chess. In order for an ai chessbot to teach me chess as efficiently as possible, that bot is probably superhuman at ches

I think you're imagining something like chess. In order for an ai chessbot to teach me chess as efficiently as possible, that bot is probably superhuman at chess. That's not necessarily the case. A good tutor can be more "curator" than "creator of course content" I can learn math by reading existing math textbooks. Imagine having an ai that is able to judge my knowledge of that math and assign reading or problem sets accordingly. Imagine an AI that is compelling to talk to and keeps me on task given my stated learning goals. None of that requires superhuman anything. Would I still want to learn linear algebra even if the frontier of math is being advanced by some super intelligence? Sure, why not? Isn't the frontier already being advanced by many people smarter than I am?