I find the requirement to give a note together is a good insensitive to stay focus on what the topic is, try to grab it, ask questions to start to put some ligh

I find the requirement to give a note together is a good insensitive to stay focus on what the topic is, try to grab it, ask questions to start to put some lights on the biggest dark corner of the task. I couldn't care less about the resulting quantification. What matter is how well we communicate in the team, how helpful we are with each other, how well we can progress and keep motivation where struggle with huge hindrances paving the way. The points are not the point, but they are not pointless. The map is not the territory. Everyone can have a different map and a different metric system if any. If at the end of the day people inhabiting the territory do it in a satisfying way, all good. It doesn't matter much what the plan on the paper might look like: it will always be a mere epiphenomenal artifact of the actual human processes at play.