4 ms·

You are labeling people disagreeing with you evil and globalists and bad persons, this is the direct path to authoritarianism and its murderous consequences. Yo

by kmos17 2y ago

You are labeling people disagreeing with you evil and globalists and bad persons, this is the direct path to authoritarianism and its murderous consequences. Your statements are driven by hate, please look in the mirror at your own words and beliefs. Trump appointed judges that stated row vs. wade was settled case law during their confirmation hearings, directly lying to congress. Of course Trump is not himself pro abortion, he is a philanderer who slept with porn stars, he has zero interest in the issue, but he has used the political issue to gain power and his actions have already greatly damaged individual rights in this country, and will continue to do so.

webninja 2y ago
No, I labeled news sources who have intentionally deluded you as bad people. Some of those bad people are probably globalists. Some of those globalists are evil. All of the above are people that can’t even pretend successfully that they care about you nor your country. No, this stance is driven by the truth. Truth by which you haven’t refuted nor provided evidence to the contrary beyond one line: > Trump appointed judges that stated row vs. Wade was settled case law during their confirmation hearings, directly lying to congress. First, actions matter more than words. The Supreme Court is balanced now and is doing a commendable job. See FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, and Moyle v. United States as 3 examples. Second, judging by everything else you’ve written I don’t think you’re capable of detecting lies or not. Repeating what you heard on MSNBC or CNN is about as correct as reporting what you heard on Breitbart and InfoWars. They don’t let the facts get in the way of a good narrative. Regarding the rest of your response, you don’t have an argument to the contrary so now you engage in Whataboutism. What about this? What about that? If you want to engage like that, start a new comment for each of your new topics. But so long as you want to send the conversation in a new direction, you show that can’t argue the validity of this point and you have lost this debate. Which is okay See further: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

by kmos17 2y ago

webninja 2y ago

No, I labeled news sources who have intentionally deluded you as bad people. Some of those bad people are probably globalists. Some of those globalists are evil. All of the above are people that can’t even pretend successfully that they care about you nor your country. No, this stance is driven by the truth. Truth by which you haven’t refuted nor provided evidence to the contrary beyond one line: > Trump appointed judges that stated row vs. Wade was settled case law during their confirmation hearings, directly lying to congress. First, actions matter more than words. The Supreme Court is balanced now and is doing a commendable job. See FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, and Moyle v. United States as 3 examples. Second, judging by everything else you’ve written I don’t think you’re capable of detecting lies or not. Repeating what you heard on MSNBC or CNN is about as correct as reporting what you heard on Breitbart and InfoWars. They don’t let the facts get in the way of a good narrative. Regarding the rest of your response, you don’t have an argument to the contrary so now you engage in Whataboutism. What about this? What about that? If you want to engage like that, start a new comment for each of your new topics. But so long as you want to send the conversation in a new direction, you show that can’t argue the validity of this point and you have lost this debate. Which is okay See further: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism