3 ms·
It is interesting that HN commentators spotted this, while peer review didn’t. I often get great comments from peer review, but I used to worry that some criti
by gylterud 2y ago
It is interesting that HN commentators spotted this, while peer review didn’t.
I often get great comments from peer review, but I used to worry that some critical mistake would be missed (one time there was!). My work is purely theoretical, so these days I formalise everything in a proof assistant. But in empirical science, there is no such certainty to be had. There really should be some kind of comment section under the published works.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- nurettin 2y agoThat comment section should be moderated and merit points need to be awarded based on the personal opinions of other armchair experts.