> What I am more interested in is the constant pressure on "safety risks" without anything that feels tangible to me so far. Exactly. I think it's the classic

> What I am more interested in is the constant pressure on "safety risks" without anything that feels tangible to me so far. Exactly. I think it's the classic "I'm so smart I can reason about the world without any evidence". This is a perennial trap that very smart people fall into. The antidote is to always look for evidence or "something tangible".