4 ms·
I assume it’s the MPC part that would need the Sybil protection? Also, another assumption, but it’s that doc still builds upon the W3C proposal - would it not
by MrAlex94 2y ago
I assume it’s the MPC part that would need the Sybil protection?
Also, another assumption, but it’s that doc still builds upon the W3C proposal - would it not be worth raising as an issue in the repo? Seems to still be active.
- stebalien 2y agoIt's all other parties, actually. I'm assuming Mozilla and friends are trusted and that the cryptography is perfect. I've filed an issue at https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/ipa/issues/90 https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/ipa/issues/90 but I'm still not sure if that's the right repo.