2 ms·
> If someone's paying you to say something, it's a conflict of interest and illegal. That already misses a huge problem though, I don't pay Mozilla for Firefox
by _heimdall 2y ago
> If someone's paying you to say something, it's a conflict of interest and illegal.
That already misses a huge problem though, I don't pay Mozilla for Firefox and I don't pay most online sites and services that gobble up my data and sell it off.
- robin_reala 2y agoMozilla has never given us a choice to pay for Firefox.
- _heimdall 2y agoSure, but I don't think that really changes anything here. The idea of a law that bans advertising when the customer pays you would miss a huge portion of advertising and data collection including Firefox.
- SebastianKra 2y agoThat's what my third paragraph was for.
- _heimdall 2y agoIs the concern you want fixed only that paid products still collect and sell data? I may have misunderstood you, but my read on the third paragraph was mainly that Firefox, in this case, could still have a free browser that collects and sells data. That rule would just add one more fsctor for them to consider if they ever want a paid browser, they both need a viable market and be willing to give up the option to sell data.