4 ms·
My point is that "probably" falls short of rigorous mathematical proof.
by smitty1e 2y ago
My point is that "probably" falls short of rigorous mathematical proof.
- karmakurtisaani 2y agoSurely you're not expecting anything rigorous related to the simulation hypothesis..
- smitty1e 2y agoI find it intellectually unsatisfying, so no. But the way semi-serious people kick the idea around, sure. Pony up. I don't think that my religious beliefs submit to rigor, either. But I'm not here pushing something labeled as "religious beliefs" as a "hypothesis", either. By the same token, if someone wants to call it the "Simulation Belief" in a religious sense, then I will lay by my dish.