3 ms·
You still have to wait for your cache to reload from main memory, or for disk or network I/O, or for processes to be scheduled to run, so while it's likely more
by rwmj 2y ago
You still have to wait for your cache to reload from main memory, or for disk or network I/O, or for processes to be scheduled to run, so while it's likely more efficient than epoll approaches, I doubt there's any really fundamental difference in the performance problems you would find.